Advertisement

From Labour’s totalitarian press reform: Journalism is ok but not when it is about “private matters”

The Labour Party is pushing a totalitarian press reform without consultation which will create a military committee to oversee the press and enact SLAPP laws in Malta.

The draft bill will also create a new limitation on journalism on private matters which will be introduced in the constitution. This limitation is a gross overreach that the Minister of Justice, Jonathan Attard didn’t dare to mention, yesterday in his press conference.

The privacy of public persons should never be a constitutional right, but here we are. Everyone will be granted the constitutional right to privacy, even public persons. I am sure that this goes against current EU law and case law and there will be plenty more opportunities by which to contest the government’s totalitarian proposals legally both in Maltese and in European courts.

Why would the government press on to enact a law on the press against the wishes of the press and without any consultation?

Because the government is not interested in helping the press – the government is at war against it.

When people like Kurt Sansone and Matthew Xuereb of the Institute of Maltese Journalists stop being “gentlemanly” and realise the gravity of the situation, maybe we can have an organisation which represents the interests of journalists instead of an organisation which ingratiates with the government.


Comments

9 responses to “From Labour’s totalitarian press reform: Journalism is ok but not when it is about “private matters””

  1. […] Minister of Justice, Jonathan Attard, and all the merry Labour men and women who are pushing their totalitarian press reform, think of the press. The minority of journalists who have remained silent on Labour’s press […]

  2. […] any public consultation. Neither was it in the manifesto that new provisions would be introduced to protect the privacy of everyone – a direct restriction on the press. If Labour wanted to protect the press it would have […]

  3. […] are finally waking up to the news that the government has taken them for a ride on its forced press reform. You can follow this thread on Twitter by Christopher Schwaiger to read about the […]

  4. […] quell any suspicions about his government. Instead, the first major reform of the government is a direct attack on the free press with a reform that the press doesn’t want and more is to come with plans to re-introduce […]

  5. […] to impose an authoritarian press reform on the press which among many items included the ban on the publication of private matters. Such a reform would have made the publication of the Rosianne and Yorgen chats illegal, […]

  6. […] a military council to control it whilst introducing the absolute right to privacy for everyone in Malta’s constitution. Eventually, journalists realised that Robert’s press reform was a total deceptive fraud and […]

  7. […] 1 –? Constitutional reform which guarantees the absolute right to privacy to everyone and the banning of the publication of “private matters”. […]

  8. […] 1 – Constitutional reform which guarantees the absolute right to privacy to everyone and the banning of the publication of “private matters”. […]

  9. […] restrictive measures against the press in the guise of privacy laws. These new laws will give the absolute right to privacy to every individual including politically exposed persons and […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *