Advertisement

The Courts are making a Carnival Festival out of Lilu l-King’s cases

This is not the season to scrutinise the judiciary, but I can’t help myself when I read a court sitting deliberation as if I am reading a Reader’s Digest Psychologist Column for Broken Men Having Middle-Life Crises. In Lilu l-King’s case over his bail breach after he was seen threatening Police officers, the Magistrate forfeited Lilu only ย€6,000 of his bail ย€100,000 deposit and fined him the maximum ย€4,000 fine.

The Prosecutor didn’t even demand his re-incarceration. The Court session ended with the Magistrate accommodating Lilu with the advice that went something like “Be careful with your adrenaline, and don’t allow it to go over your head” to which Lilu replied “I am sorry”.

Is everyone going out of their mind? When did Libyan gangsters and drug-dealers could have coffee-like talk in Court? Magistrate Kevan Azzopardi should even have offered him a coffee following the Court session to continue their psychological therapy in private. Maybe, he’ll give him more advice on how to behave whilst breaking the law.

Our Justice system has been abused and disfigured to the extent that its results are becoming ever more surreal.

 

 


Comments

  1. Xewka avatar

    Why this trash can’t be deported?

    1. Paul Berman avatar
      Paul Berman

      He can and should be, for some reason he is being protected, he is wanted in Libya for murder but the people running Malta let him stay here, he pays no tax and they never asked where the large sums of money come from

  2. Charles avatar
    Charles

    Yes I fully agree with Mark! It is so sad to see so many incompetent and inexperienced to say the least, decisions by the Court Jesters. Here is a creature accused of very serious crimes being given an extension to go watch a boxing match. Then he insults and attacks police meaning he broke a condition of his bail and he only forfeits a pittance of his bail surety. And just because he utters..”I’m sorry” he is set free ! One wonders if a deal had been made with prosecution and defence prior to the court sitting!!

  3. I always believed that when both sides (if not 3) are asked to approach the bench, and speak between themselves in a hushed up voice, that a deal is being worked up. Possibly a division of the sum being discussed, like splitting 40 vs 30%: the rest goes ……….

  4. […] Note that this is not the first time Lilu l-King breached his bail conditions. […]

  5. […] dear Magistrate. It seems that your psychology session with the accused didn’t result according to your […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *