Advertisement

Here is the shameful law that will protect money-launderers

The law is only in Maltese at this stage and hasn’t been translated yet. The core reform of Labour’s proposed money-laundering bill can be read in Article 18 and its succeeding one. You can download it here.

As you can read, the law changes the burden of proof from the suspect to the prosecutor. It also greatly limits what the prosecutor can do, and limits them to ask for a freeze only of the assets that can be proved to have been money laundered. The law is a joke for reasons already described and it gives unprecedented power to money laundering suspects to keep operating and moving their assets even when suspected of money laundering and are undergoing proceedings in court. The Minister of Justice is also lying about the constitutional court having condemned the law since the constitutional court only condemned the unnecessary delays.

The law greatly diminishes the power of the Attorney General who has so far remained completely silent on the reform. It is customary for the Attorney General to provide her opinion to the government on the laws it proposes, and the Attorney General can also make this public. In this regard, where specifically the power of the prosecutor is going to be greatly diminished, it is the responsibility of the Attorney General to speak up and defend its role.


Comments

  1. […] and Prime Minister’s business associate Christian Borg will also greatly benefit from the money laundering reforms that Labour government is trying to rush through. The arraignment and imminent prosecution in court […]

  2. […] biggest beneficiaries of the money-laundering reforms, which will prohibit wide-reaching asset freezes on money laundering suspects, and which are being […]

  3. […] that the proposed money-laundering reforms are needed because the courts have condemned them: a convenient lie that was stated by Justice Minister Jonathan Attard. Anti-money laundering rules and regulations were only tightened further under Joseph […]

  4. […] an important fact that needs to be considered about the government’s proposals to reduce the power of authorities to freeze assets of money […]

  5. […] an important fact that needs to be considered about the government’s proposals to reduce the power of authorities to freeze assets of money […]

  6. […] use the law to cover up for themselves and their associates; a case in point is the proposed anti-money laundering bill. Their legal expertise in anything other than criminal activity and financial crime is dubious at […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *