I would love to know what the PN administration thinks about the scenario of the Labour Party Parliamentary group voting against Prime Minister Robert Abela in a vote of no confidence. I doubt they would disclose their thoughts on this, but I am willing to pursue them about it.
I’m definitely sure that the Nationalist Party is not prepared and does not want the Labour Party to dramatically change its leader and make Chris Fearne Prime Minister at this very moment. Strategically, it would be their worst case scenario.
The Nationalist Party is betting that Robert Abela will keep losing votes while the Nationalist Party keeps making minimal gains. Having spoken to senior Nationalist Party sources in the past, they say that they are not planning for a grand home-run, but are banking on the effects of inflation, cost-of-living and increased economic challanges to compel voters to turn away from Labour. This is a reasonable strategy that is slowly paying off.
The problem with this strategy is that it based on a defensive precept and the prerequisite of a very weak enemy. If Chris Fearne replaces Robert Abela as Prime Minister, the Nationalist Party would have to change its strategy and immediately go on the offensive: that’s a very costly strategy right now which the Nationalist Party may not even be able to pull-off with its current leader.
If Chris Fearne eventually replaces Robert Abela, the urgency to replace the Nationalist Party leader would also increase for strategic reasons to the Nationalist Party, and this would coincide with the beginning of a series of cross-party resignations in a normalisation process of politics and governance across the state. Things could change rapidly fast in days after weeks and months of nothing happening.
Website Editor
Historian and Publisher



Leave a Reply