Updated. We spoke to Ishmael Barbara who has clarified that the venue for the AGM has been communicated to members. This will be at the Centenary Hall, Ta’ Qali.
The Malta Football Referees Association (MFRA) is set to hold its Annual General Meeting (AGM) this Wednesday at 17:30, but the event is already mired in controversy. A lack of transparency, suspected manipulation of voting logistics, and internal dissatisfaction have raised concerns among membersโmany of whom fear that fair democratic processes are being undermined.
In accordance with the MFRAโs statute, members should have been informed in a timely manner about all candidates contesting the election, including for the key posts of President and Secretary. Although the deadline for nominations closed last Friday, Mr. Barbara has yet to release any official list of candidates. This delay has further fueled speculation that internal interests are being prioritized over fairness and transparency. It transpires that Barbara also informed the members on the list of candidates yesterday.
Reliable sources suggest that a legal advisor from the Malta Football Association (MFA) is assisting the MFRA in navigating what is expected to be a highly contentious meeting. While the statute does not allow for the disqualification of eligible contestants, the lack of alternative voting options means that only members physically present will be able to voteโexcluding many who are unable to attend due to logistical issues. Notably, the MFRA had previously allowed remote voting when it suited their objectives, prompting accusations of double standards.
Election process under the spotlight
The election process itself is also under scrutiny. During the term when Mario Apap was elected president, questions were raised about his eligibility, with allegations that he failed to meet the minimum required attendance (“terz tal-laqgฤงat”). Yet his candidacy was permitted, reportedly with tacit support from MFA officials. Additionally, it is claimed that 2โ3 individuals who were not official members at the time were allowed to vote.
Tensions are also rising over recent communications. A public statement issued by MFRA concerning what was described as Malcolm Spiteriโs final match has been criticised internally, with many members arguing it was politically motivated. According to sources, the statement may have been requested by MFA President Bjorn Vassallo, who mentioned it during a recent MFRA event.
Names such as Matthew Degabriele and Jurgen Spiteri have also emerged in connection with the upcoming election, with some members hoping that their potential involvement will usher in change and restore credibility to the association. However, with critical information still being withheld, even their possible candidacies remain in limbo. Barbara has informed us that both Spiteri and Degabriele are not members of the MFRA and thus their candidature will be put to a vote before the meeting. The vote will be scrutinized by an electoral commission.
All eyes are now on Wednesdayโs AGMโa meeting that could not only determine the leadership of the MFRA but also set the tone for how refereeing governance in Malta will be perceived going forward. Media interest is expected to be high, given the unfolding drama and the implications for sport governance in the country.
Sports Editor
Veteran Journalist
Leave a Reply