Advertisement

In defence of smart children

Following our investigation about Malta’s education system, we have received a lot of feedback from a number of different professionals. It is extremely alarming and concerning how Labour has crushed education standards in Malta and is effectively dumbing down future generations.

From most of the feedback that we have gathered from different professionals in the education system, we have learnt some alarming facts which have led to this rapid decline in education standards. Firstly, the system has been dead-set against smart children.

In 2011, the Nationalist government abolished streaming and bundled drastically different-performing children into one group. The abolition of streaming was not made on educational grounds, meaning that its abolition was not intended to improve education standards or the level of education: it was meant as a political move for the sake of โ€œintegrationโ€ and โ€œequalityโ€. This means that the smartest children have been bundled with much lower-performing students, and now have to sit through an education that is far below previous levels. The education system has now created an inherent bias against smart and high-performing children simply to prevent the parents of lower-performing children from being offended. The result is that smart and high-performing students in public schools are being offered a substandard level of education.

Secondly, there is a new culture of over-diagnosis of different children who are being targeted by psychologists and psychiatrists in a wild racket where every difference is being diagnosed as a mental-health condition such as ADHD. A child is misbehaving? Itโ€™s ADHD. Children are even being prescribed pills and psychology sessions simply for being different, with a class of psychologists and psychiatrists benefiting from this racket through high fees and condemning many children to an unnecessary diagnosis that follows them for the rest of their lives, along with an even more substandard level of education.

Thirdly, the education system is no longer incentivising smart and high-performing children out of fear of offending lower-performing children. Previously, smart children were incentivised and rewarded with a multitude of activities that celebrated their intelligence. Back in my day, we even had TV and radio programmes in which smart children represented their schools in knowledge and intelligence contests filled with difficult puzzles and hard questions. Nowadays, the focus is on โ€œparticipationโ€ and โ€œeffortโ€. Children are increasingly not rewarded for their results and are simply praised just for showing up.

Smart children have been sacrificed on the altar of political correctness and are nowadays at risk of being over-diagnosed by unscrupulous professionals.

Lastly, parents are also to blame. Parents increasingly pretend that children should have a good time at school, completely abolishing the concept of a merit-based system that rewards effort and hard work for the sake of having it easy. There’s even an insane discussion going on about removing homework altogether.

This is a major tragedy in the making, as we are suppressing smart children and their future prospects.

We need politicians who are brave enough to admit the truth. Statistics clearly show the crashing standards of our education system, and unless someone takes the bull by the horns, we are going to lose whole generations of smart and high-performing children as they become increasingly alienated and suppressed.

Smart children need to be defended, celebrated and promoted. Yet this process of dumbing down the education system is also aligned with Labourโ€™s ongoing dumbing down of society. This is a major ongoing crisis and needs to be addressed.

 


Comments

4 responses to “In defence of smart children”

  1. Erika Micallef avatar
    Erika Micallef

    Thank you for highlighting this issue, yes high potential learners are suffering this is clearly shown in my 2022 research with local high potential / twice- exceptional learners. Misdiagnosis is also an issue!!! I work directly with such children and their families so I know what I’m talking about and it’s pretty sad for the children, the families and the potential the Nation is losing.Things did improve slightly over the last 10 years out progress is very slow and not guaranteed. These children need educational policy that targets their specific academic and socioemotional needs.

    1. Mark Camilleri avatar
      Mark Camilleri

      Can you send me your research please?

  2. Banquo avatar

    This is a brave article. Well done.

    However, the problem is not the result of some grand conspiracy to dumb down the nation. It is the result of policymakers, for the most part, following so-called experts’ advice.

    Education has become almost solely the preserve of (for lack of a better word) ‘softies’. Extremely idealistic university students want to focus on nothing more than helping the most disadvantaged, ‘integrating’ people, and being nice to everybody (which they later discover is a nightmare to make work in practice).

    Nothing in class moves faster than the slowest pupil, but it is what researchers, students, professors and journalists in education all promote, because it all looks so nice on paper.

    For a guage of the national mood, read all the articles about education. They are all about being nicer to everybody, never in excelling intellectually.

    Long gone is the stereotype of the incredibly stern teacher who expects nothing less than excellence from every single one of the pupils (those we feared as children but whose discipline we admire in retrospect). Now, it’s all about satisfying the lowest common denominator.

    Policymakers, professors, parents and the most vociferous educators all love it, so any pushback is practically anathema. Who wants to be against ‘integration’?

    This is not just a Malta phenomenon. The education sector has become very mono-intellectual and mono-ideological. Although many daily practitioners would love to challenge the status quo, they have no outlet to do so.

    To risk it means to risk becoming ostracised, and so teachers struggle with teaching pupils who need individual attention but cannot get it in the current setup, and others who need more intellectual stimulation than they are getting but cannot get it because the focus is on helping the neediest student.

    The end result is that nobody who needs it most (the children) is satisfied, but everyone involved in shaping education feels that they are doing something good for the nation, because it all looks so darn good on paper.

    1. Banquo avatar

      It may sound trivial, but look at how the ‘girja mal-president’ was renamed ‘mixja mal-president’. It sounds like inclusion because nobody wants to offend those who cannot run, but nobody was expecting the infirm to run in the first place, so it is ultimately a lowering of ambition and anticipation, without doing anything to improve inclusion, because nobody was excluded in the first place.

      I think the devolvement of Malta’s national ‘run’ into a ‘walk’ is an excellent example of Malta’s standards and ambitions. It’s all about making everyone feel good. Actually moving forward is on very few people’s minds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *