Advertisement

Keith Schembri’s phone is still officially missing and the court expert contradicted both himself and Magistrate Donatella Frendo Dimech

In shocking revelations made today by the court’s expert, Keith Cutajar, during court proceedings over the handling of Keith Schembri’s evidence, it transpired that officially Keith Schembri’s phone is still missing. Keith Cutajar also contradicted his previous testimony and Magistrate Donatella Frendo Dimech’s assertions that Keith Schembri’s phone had been found. The court expert also made a shocking admission that he had no remit in handling the evidence of Keith Schembri and only did so by the orders of the Magistrate. Clearly, Keith Cutajar seems to have tried to cover up and appease the Magistrate as best as he could, until it became evidently clear that the Magistrate couldn’t keep up her charade. It is important to note that Keith Cutajar also defended the Magistrate over her handling of court evidence when in fact, the situation was totally the opposite of what he had said to be.

Keith Schembri’s mobile phone contains incriminating evidence against various top-profile political figures, including Robert Abela himself. We also know for a fact that Magistrate Donatella Frendo Dimecha was in communication with Robert Abela himself via WhatsApp. We also know that the evidence (data) of Keith Schembri’s mobile phone was demanded by Yorgen Fenech’s defence team. This saga is also pushing out the divisions in the criminal world out in the open.

Primarily as a consequence of the case of Keith Schembri’s mobile phone, Magistrate Donatella Frendo Dimech is being demoted from the financial crimes court to a district court – Darren Debono and his defense team are not happy with this. Darren Debono also has a rivalry with Keith Schembri stemming from the revelations that Keith Schembri fed a fake story to Saviour Balzan saying that Darren Debono was an accomplice in the murder of Daphne Caruana Galizia. Edward Gatt, Keith Schembri’s lawyer is being seen as responsible for having brought the scandal of Keith Schembri’s mobile phone to the Magistrate’s feet causing her demotion.


Comments

8 responses to “Keith Schembri’s phone is still officially missing and the court expert contradicted both himself and Magistrate Donatella Frendo Dimech”

  1. Sleight of hand ;) avatar
    Sleight of hand ๐Ÿ˜‰

    I believe that the problem lies here:

    From The Times report,
    ?IT expert Martin Bajada, who was responsible for analysing Schembri?s phone, testified that he handed the device to the court in January 2023. But according to minutes of the case, the phone was presented to the court six months later, on July 31.

    Bajada told the court that he was sure that he had handed over the phone in January, and that he had a receipt to prove it.

    ?I have no control over court minutes,? he said.?

    If Martin Bajada is a Freemason, which I?m strongly inclined to believe, we have a huge problem.

    Just do the math?

  2. […] of Keith Schembri’s missing mobile phone, what’s mostly clear is that the court expert, Keith Cutajar lied under oath about multiple things, and he is incredibly […]

  3. isleofcorruption avatar
    isleofcorruption

    How convenient for Keith,it must be nice to have a friend(s) in the judiciary?

  4. […] the very serious incident of the missing phone of Keith Schembri from the court’s evidence room, the administration of the courts has changed the current […]

  5. […] the courts to handle forensic evidence along with Keith Cutajar. Keith Cutajar has been accused by Keith Schembri’s defense of improperly handling Keith Schembri’s phone against irregular orders by Magistrate Donatella Frendo Dimech. Martin Bajada has claimed that he […]

  6. […] system, another piece of evidence was lost from the court’s evidence room last week. Since Keith Schembri’s phone was being moved around without the necessary written permissions, a newly appointed custodian of the court’s evidence room has been appointed. Jessica Tanti, […]

  7. […] MITA’s position in their position, but first and foremost one has to consider the fact that Keith Cutajar, who currently holds a near-monopoly, on services provided to the state in relation to […]

  8. […] evidence room. This followed a court expert’s testimony, stating that after analysing the mobile phone, no tampering was […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *