Advertisement

Controversial planning reforms spark backlash from ADPD and Momentum

Major concerns have been raised by ADPD and Momentum in reaction to two proposed planning law reforms set to be discussed in Parliament. Both parties claim the legislative changes, tabled by the government shortly before the summer recess, undermine public participation, weaken environmental safeguards, and give unprecedented leeway to powerful developers.

Deputy Chairperson of ADPD, Carmel Cacopardo, described the reforms as โ€œa step backwards,โ€ stating they would make it harder for civil society to follow or challenge large-scale development proposals. He warned of reduced timeframes for appeals and the removal of environmental considerations from Planning Authority assessments, leading to what he called a โ€œlack of certaintyโ€ in policy application. Cacopardo accused the government of turning the Planning Authority into a mere โ€œpermit factory,โ€ leaving communities exposed to speculative development.

Chairperson Sandra Gauci further criticised both the Labour government and the Opposition for enabling what she termed the โ€œlegalisation of abuseโ€ along the coast. Referring to a development along the Qawra shoreline, she highlighted a case where illegal construction was regularised with a โ‚ฌ2 million fine payable in instalments and an annual rent of โ‚ฌ138,000. She pointed to this as a case of โ€œgiving a finger and losing a hand,โ€ as developers push for further expansion.

ADPD also noted the Planning Authorityโ€™s failure to update traffic studies used to justify developments, accusing it of ignoring realities on the ground. Secretary General Ralph Cassar denounced the cumulative loss of coastal access due to lidos and piecemeal developments that chip away at public space, especially in densely populated areas like St Paulโ€™s Bay.

Meanwhile, Momentum echoed these concerns, condemning the reforms as a direct assault on democracy and environmental protection. The party criticised proposed changes that allow the Planning Authority to disregard its own policies and enable development in outside development zones (ODZ) without permits, provided structures are not street-visible. It also flagged the removal of court oversight over planning permits and the introduction of fines for so-called โ€œvexatiousโ€ appeals, calling the move โ€œintimidation of objectors.โ€

Momentum Chair Arnold Cassola accused the government of rushing reforms without consultation and prioritising developer interests over citizensโ€™ rights and the countryโ€™s natural heritage. He warned that the changes would further entrench overdevelopment and environmental degradation, labelling them โ€œdangerousโ€ and โ€œshort-sighted.โ€

Environmentalists and NGOs have also condemned what they describe as the worst planning bill in history, warning that it will cause immense damage to the environment. NGO representatives also stated that the government didnโ€™t even conduct any consultation with them on the bills and instead opted to appease the interests of the construction lobby.

Echoing this outrage, a coalition of NGOs led by Moviment Graffitti sent an open letter to Prime Minister Robert Abela, expressing โ€œprofound disgustโ€ at what they called a wish list drafted for developers. The letter condemned the lack of consultation and warned that the governmentโ€™s draft legislation represents an intentional dismantling of the few environmental and planning safeguards still in place. The NGOs also criticised the governmentโ€™s decision to push the bills during the summer, accusing it of bypassing democratic standards and ignoring repeated civil society requests for meaningful dialogue on planning reform. A protest press conference is scheduled for this evening, Monday 28th July at 6 p.m. in front of Parliament.


Comments

3 responses to “Controversial planning reforms spark backlash from ADPD and Momentum”

  1. Look up the word “reform”, this is not a reform this is regress!

  2. […] Graffitti and several environmental NGOs outside Parliament this evening in protest against controversial planning reforms proposed in Bills 143 and 144. The protestors warned that the reforms threaten democratic oversight, […]

  3. […] a Freedom of Information (FOI) request demanding full transparency over the drafting process of two controversial planning reform bills – Bills 143 and 144 – set to reshape Maltaโ€™s land-use and development framework. The […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *