Advertisement

Chris Said is lying about the case of his brothers who raped a young girl

Chris Said is lying thorough his teeth but don’t take my word for it. Read his own words which are deeply contradictory as he tries to avoid any connection to his brothers who paid the family of a young girl to keep her silent after having raped her. The payment was brokered by another relative of Chris Said, Catholic Priest Michael Said (confirmed that they are related).

The Said siblings are 14 in total.

Chris Said told Times of Malta that he got to know about the case of his brothers from the press. This is not what he said back in 2008 when the case was reported. An old MaltaToday article by David Darmanin reported that Chris Said informed Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi of the case before his brothers were arraigned in Court. This means that a press notice wasn’t even issued yet because the Police only issue the press notice of the arraignment after or when the arraignment is being made.

Obviously, Chris Said is lying to his teeth. He may be able to deceive those who don’t remember those times very well but I actually do and those were times when the Police ignored and regularly failed to take action on reports about violence against women. Government transparency was deeply lacking and there was also centralised control with deep influence by government Ministers. It is highly unlikely, that in those conditions, Chris Said, as a government Minister (he was a Junior Minister or Parliamentary Secretary with the OPM during that time) didn’t know about the case.

In fact he knew about the case well in advance of its Court sitting, and MaltaToday reported that Chris Said informed the Prime Minister about it in advance – obviously to avoid the embarrassment for himself. What makes it more scandalous is that, today, Chris Said is even defending his brothers and he does not deny that the victim’s family was paid a compensation sum.

Gozo Rules.


Comments

8 responses to “Chris Said is lying about the case of his brothers who raped a young girl”

  1. M.Galea avatar

    Ukoll!! Skond dan mhux veru li hutu abbuzaw min din it-tifla!! Inkredibbli!

  2. Vincent ciliberti avatar
    Vincent ciliberti

    And that is why one has to be precise in reporting matters.
    When did Dr. Chris Said was asked? Was it yesterday or very recently, or was he asked quite a long time ago?
    Am asking because the report says “Asked whether he was aware of the agreement…” Hence my question.

  3. Why did you mention the size of the Said family (14 siblings)? Itโ€™s not really relevant.
    โ€ข The number of siblings has no direct bearing on whether:
    โ€ข a crime occurred
    โ€ข Chris Said knew about it
    โ€ข he is telling the truth
    Including this detail is a rhetorical tactic
    From what you shared, the claim of lying is based on a contradiction between two statements:
    โ€ข Claim 1: He said he learned about the case from the press
    โ€ข Claim 2: A past article suggests he informed the Prime Minister before arraignment
    This raises a legitimate question, but not automatic proof of lying.

    Contradiction โ‰  proof of lying !!!!!

    To prove someone is lying, you would need:
    โ€ข Verified records (emails, official logs, testimony, etc.)
    โ€ข Direct, reliable documentation of what he knew and when
    โ€ข Context (was he referring to different aspects of the case?)

    The language you are using;
    โ€ข โ€œlying through his teethโ€ several times !!!!!
    โ€ข โ€œobviouslyโ€
    โ€ข โ€œGozo rulesโ€
    These are not neutral journalistic phrases at all!

    Those are;
    โ€ข your Strong opinions
    โ€ข Emotional framing
    โ€ข An attempt to persuade rather than just inform
    This moves the piece you wrote from:
    โ€ข Investigative journalism โ†’ into commentary or opinion

    Why did you use family members in accusations??!!
    Another key concern you raised:
    โ€ข The alleged crime involves his brothers, not him
    โ€ข Yet the article connects:
    โ€ข him
    โ€ข extended family
    โ€ข even a priest relative
    This creates guilt by association, which is problematic.

    Based on what you shared, it has several signs of that:
    โ€ข Strong accusatory language without hard evidence shown
    โ€ข Focus on character attack, not just facts
    โ€ข Inclusion of irrelevant details (family size)
    โ€ข Framing that suggests systemic corruption without proof

    That doesnโ€™t mean the issue itself isnโ€™t serious, but it does mean the presentation is biased

    To me, this reads more like a politically driven opinion piece than balanced reporting.

    1. Totally disgusted avatar
      Totally disgusted

      Istฤงi hekk taf kif Lilly!

      Inutli qed tipprova tiddefendi l- indifendibli, saret vjolenza sesswali fuq tifla u ppruvaw jaฤงbuwa taฤงt it-tapit.

      http://archive.maltatoday.com.mt/2008/09/21/t8.html

      Din hija ir-riferenza gฤงal- artiklu tal- Malta Today – 21.09.2008 – li l- anฤกlu bir-raฤกฤกiera Chris Said kien jaf.

      DIลปGUST TOTALI.

      1. M.Galea avatar

        Totally disgusted….sewwa qalet Lilly ma kienx hemm bzonn isemmi kemm huma ahwa! X relevanza hi dik!?

    2. nazzjonalista li tidhol hawn biex tisma fuq il laburisti…u meta sabet artiklu kontra it team taghha… xelghulha l bozzoz. KEMM HU IKRAH IL PARTIGANIZMU!

  4. […] victim who who testified in Court that she was raped by the brothers of Chris Said, testified that she was raped multiple time at the construction yard of the Said brothers, Said […]

  5. […] how the justice system handles cases of rape increased recently following the scandal involving two Gozitan brothers of an ex-government Minister who got away with raping a 13-year old […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *