Advertisement

All plebs are equal without electricity

The Labour government continues to make a mockery of the Equality Act and its principles by proposing to introduce constitutional amendments in relation to the act at a time when the country faces a national crisis with a series of constant and ongoing electricity cuts.

The Opposition left the Chamber yesterday as Rosianne Cutajar brought the bill to a vote. The bill needs a two-thirds majority due to the Constitutional amendments in Parliament and hence the bill will not pass.

The Labour Party already made a mockery of this act by appointing Rosianne Cutajar as the Minister meant to pilot it, but it is now engaging in explicit cognitative dissonance to amend the constitution on what is widely perceived to be a non-consequential act while the government is unable to provide electricity to households and businesses.

As already discussed, the Labour Party has no genuine interest with these laws other than to divert attention from its complete takeover of state institutions and the inevitable consequences, such a the extensive corruption and incompetence leading to the current electricity blackouts.

Everyone is asking why โ€œthe greatest investment the Maltese government has ever madeโ€ since 2022 is still not producing any actual positive results, with electricity blackouts remaining equally relentless year after year. The majority of the population expects answers from the Energy Minister, while the Labour Party is putting Rosianne Cutajar, of all people, at the forefront of its efforts to amend the Constitution through her โ€œequality amendmentsโ€.

It takes a tremendous amount of courage to remain hopeful for your country and society when faced with such a gross and catastrophic scenario, but here we are.

The Constitutional amendments can be found here in article 58.


Comments

One response to “All plebs are equal without electricity”

  1. Bastjan avatar

    What’s the story here, and what’s your point? That the equality act cannot proceed until electricity is restored and improved? The two things are unrelated.

    The only relevance I can identify is the point you make, probably true, that the party is only interested in diverting attention with inconsequential acts. That may be, but what is your proposed solution?

    Yes, the act may be of little consequence in a sham democracy, it might be used to divert attention, and it is riddled with elements of hypocrisy, but bills like this is the only thing remaining. I don’t have much faith, either, but it is still important to have such tools in our legislative arsenal. If only to prove they don’t work, instead of giving the powers-that-be the convenient excuse of “well, unfortunately we did propose such and such but it did not pass, hence the current status quo”.

    I for one would welcome these amendments, regardless of their real effect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *