Advertisement

The Nationalist Party publishes amendments to the government’s anti-SLAPP reform on the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists

The Nationalist Opposition has proposed amendments to the government’s newly introduced anti-SLAPP measures following the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive dubbed as “Daphne’s Law”. The motion, which was tabled in parliament last week, is proposing to amend the government’s legal amendments to make the anti-SLAPP provisions more protective of journalists and their free speech.

The amendments propose applying the vexatious-rule to cases initiated by foreign courts as well to cases filed in local courts. The original anti-SLAPP reforms include a provision allowing local courts to dismiss vexatious libel cases filed through foreign courts in the first instance. The Nationalist Opposition is proposing that this rule also apply to cases filed locally.

The other significant provision that the Nationalist Opposition is proposing is to apply a penalty on the plaintiff if they initiate a vexatious libel case. The proposed penalty for vexatious filings ranges from โ‚ฌ10,000 to โ‚ฌ100,000, on the basis that abuse of the justice system should be considered a more serious infringement of the law than libelous speech. Maximum libel damages in Malta are set at โ‚ฌ10,000.

The motion, which also calls for the government to conduct a consultation exercise with journalists regarding the anti-SLAPP reform, was signed by Claudette Buttigieg and Karol Aquilina.


Comments

8 responses to “The Nationalist Party publishes amendments to the government’s anti-SLAPP reform on the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists”

  1. […] only affords protection against lawsuits filed in foreign courts and of a transnational nature, amendments proposed by the Opposition would add that protection should extend to SLAPP cases initiated in Maltese courtsโ€”a move the […]

  2. […] in Parliament, the Labour government has presented its press reforms, and rejected amendments by the Nationalist Party which would have created symmetry in libel cases: amendments which were […]

  3. […] ways, the Nationalist Party is already ahead of Labour on policies on free speech. Apart from their excellent proposals on libel laws, PN MP Mark Anthony Sammut wants to decriminalise all offensive […]

  4. […] very good proposal about the press reform was proposed by the Nationalist Party, specifically by Karol Aquilian and Claudette Buttigieg. The government has refused to consider […]

  5. […] possible under the law. The Nationalist Party proposed to improve the current defamation laws by proposing the concept of symmetry in civil defamation cases. The government has refused to pick up these proposals. The Maltese […]

  6. […] the situation with regard to cases that are instituted locally.ย  The Nationalist Party recently proposed a law that introduces symmetrical justice in libel and defamation cases by awarding financial damages to […]

  7. […] along with a boycott of political parties proposing such measures; symmetry in libel cases as proposed by the Nationalist Party, whereby journalists are also awarded damages in vexatious cases filed against them; and the […]

  8. […] not proposing the law previously proposed by its MPs, Karol Aquilina and Claudette Buttigieg about introducing symmetry in libel cases by imposing damages on the libel claimants if they lose the […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *