Advertisement

Malta joins Belgium, Italy and Bulgaria in opposing the use of frozen Russian assets for Ukraine

Malta is a signatory to a statement released by Belgium, Italy and Bulgaria declaring opposition to the European Commission’s proposal to fast-track a law to issue a reparations-loan to Ukraine backed with Russian assets as collateral. Belgium has been opposing this proposal fearing Russian repercussions. Malta did not oppose the latest action of indefinitely freezing Russian assets.

The Maltese Herald contacted local diplomatic sources and confirmed that Malta is opposing in principle to avoid the use of qualified-majority voting at the European Council. We confirm that Malta is using the issue of the reparations loan over a point of principle.

This is very reckless because the case of the reparations loan is currently a top priority in the European agenda due to Ukraine’s emergency budget shortfall. Ukraine lacks funds to run its infrastructure as Russia bombs its infrastructure and cities on a daily basis resulting in constant and extensive power blackouts for Ukrainian citizens. Failing to provide Ukraine with the required funds for its budget will also compromise its current gains in the battlefield.

There may be hidden interests in Malta’s opposition to the reparations-loan that may not have been declared, however Malta has always been consistently supportive of the EU’s positions on Ukraine, while refraining from contributing military aid.

Diplomatic sources in Brussels continue to inform The Maltese Herald that the deal for the reparations-loan to Ukraine is highly likely with legal concerns to be addressed by the EU Commission, including by introducing collective liability to the scheme.

You can read the full statement by the quartet below.

 


Comments

5 responses to “Malta joins Belgium, Italy and Bulgaria in opposing the use of frozen Russian assets for Ukraine”

  1. […] Ukraine to score some cheap political points. He was at a political party rally today and explained Malta’s position against on the reparations loan to Ukraine with some incomprehensible babble about peace and legal […]

  2. […] move to appropriate Abaramovich’s assets comes as the EU remains deadlocked over the use of Russia’s frozen assets at Euroclear in Belgium. Talks are ongoing by the EU Commission to lift the deadlock and fill Ukraine’s budget […]

  3. […] Malta’s position on Greenland is opportunistic as it seeks the Trump dividend and this position may also be interpreted as being aligned with constitutional neutrality, however Malta is also party to the Treaty of the European Union which also calls for the defence of the Union members who suffer armed aggression. Malta’s constitutional neutrality is in contradiction with the current legal context of international events in Europe and its removal from the Constitution is long over-due. However, Malta is technically using this discordant concept in foreign affairs for opportunistic reasons, which is actually ingrained in the Labour Party’s foreign policy. Malta also took an opportunistic position on the frozen Russian assets in Europe. […]

  4. […] while refusing to provide weapons aid to Ukraine due “neutrality” and also opposing the use of frozen Russian assets for opportunistic and populist reasons under the pretenses of risk and […]

  5. […] Malta joined Belgium and Italy to oppose the use of Russian frozen assets for Ukraine. The Prime Minister has been using this issue as a populist talking point at home citing Malta’s national interests, liabilities and the potential war of Russia against Europe. Malta is also refusing to make statements on Greenland, preferring instead to preserve its good relationship with the US, but it is not clear what dividends Malta will get from the US by ignoring its European allies and partners. The Prime Minister’s position puts Malta at even more risk of isolation. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *