Advertisement

UPDATED: European Court of Justice rules that Malta’s passport sales go against the European Treaty and demands repayment of costs

The European Court of Justice has just announced its ruling on Malta’s passport sales to non-EU citizens saying the sales go against the treaty of the European Union and demanded to pay the costs of the case. The ECJ said that although the definitions and conditions for granting or losing nationality are at the discretion of Member States, the commercialisation of citizenship is incompatible with the basic concept of Union citizenship as defined by the European Union Treaty.

The case was brought to the Court via infringement proceedings by the European Commission back in 2020.

The European Union describes the bond of nationality with a Member State as one based on a specific relationship of solidarity, good faith and the reciprocity of rights and duties between States and its citizens and the commercialisation of nationality infringes on these principles. In addition, it infringes on the principle of sincere cooperation and jeopordises the mutual trust between Member states.

According to the ruling of the ECJ, the IIP violated Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European for commercialising nationality and thus violating the essential principles of EU citizenship. The Court also found that the scheme violates Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union for breaking mutual trust between Member States.

The Maltese government issued a lengthy response to the ruling saying the scheme brought investment into the country. The government statement may also be contradicting sayign that although it will respect the Court’s decision, it will modify its scheme to align with the Court’s ruling and that the decisions on the scheme by the current and previous administrations remain valid. The ECJ however, has said that Malta needs to comply with the Court’s judgement without delay.

Disgraced ex-Prime Minister Joseph Muscat, who originally founded the scheme, published a statement on Facebook saying the decision is political. Prime Minister Robert Abela said there were those who incited against this programme to earn a role, a probable reference to the European Parliament President Roberta Metsola.

 

 

 

 


Comments

8 responses to “UPDATED: European Court of Justice rules that Malta’s passport sales go against the European Treaty and demands repayment of costs”

  1. […] the decision by the European Court of Justice concluding that Malta’s Malta Individual Investor Programme (IIP) violates the treaty of the […]

  2. On the contrary this scheme has ruined the country because, as has happened in Cyprus, it raised property prices and gave rise to speculation and unbridled construction

  3. […] without any proper security screening and due diligence checks. The European Court of Justice ruled against the scheme and the Maltese government is now obliged to shut it […]

  4. Albert B. avatar
    Albert B.

    Since PM Robert Abela insists to find a way to continue with the โ€˜prostitutionโ€™ of European citizenship, residency cards and visas for free movement within the EU, I wonder how much he would accept to sell his attractive wife to be abused by a rich foreign crook or for sex trafficking?

    I think it is a fair question to ask when his values are inferior, learning from his dear Russian native pal Joseph Muscat how to be a rotten criminal and a sterile idiot like his โ€œbig ballsโ€ by not showing much respect for European law and civil rights.

  5. […] European Court of Justice has just ruled that Malta’s passport sales violate the Treaty of the European […]

  6. […] Nationalist Party condemned the Labour government for selling Maltese citizenship on the wake of a European Court of Justice decision that condemned Malta’s Golden Passport Scheme as […]

  7. […] National Development and Social Fund, which received up to 30% of the proceeds from Malta’s Golden Passport scheme, has been placed under the responsibility of the Ministry for Home Affairs, Byron Camilleri. It was […]

  8. […] scheme was struck down by the European Court of Justice which deemed it in violation of the Treaty of the European Union for commercialising […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *