Advertisement

Alkagesta’s pipsqueaks accuse us of racism and pro-Armenian bias: this is false

Alkagesta, being the fraudsters that they are, have reacted to our investigation about them on The Maltese Herald with a very extensive PR campaign that involved sponsored articles on the local press, vexatious copyright claims to Google about our articles, and also a blogging campaign with rumours, stupidity and disinformation.

One of the latest accusations against us that was spurned by Alkagesta’s media campaign against us is that we are targeting them specifically because we are racist against the people of Azerbaijan and also because we have a pro-Armenian bias. We do not understand why race and ethnic issues have to be brought into this investigation given that the theme of this investigation is mainly the Russian oil trade and not Azerbaijan itself.

Separately, we stand by with our reporting about Azerbaijan’s ethnic-cleansing of Armenians in Artsakh and Nagorno-Karabakh. The reporting is correct.

We would also like to point out that our investigations on Russian oil trading and sanctions against Russia are universal and do not discriminate by race, company or nation. In fact, we also reported on the past Russian connections of the owner of Ardshinbank who made a bid for HSBC Malta. We also highlighted the potential risks of an Armenian bank acquiring a Maltese bank due to the risks related to Russian trading and sanctions. Anyone who read our reports on Ardshinbank could understand that we had a bias against its bid for HSBC Malta due to potential risks related to Russian trading in the Armenian banking system.

It doesn’t matter whether Alkagesta is owned by Azerbaijanis or Armenians – Alkagesta is Malta’s biggest oil cargo-handler and has traded Russian oil in Europe on multiple occasions, apart from conducting other aggravated violations, and that’s all that matters.


Comments

One response to “Alkagesta’s pipsqueaks accuse us of racism and pro-Armenian bias: this is false”

  1. […] Since we have published an extensive investigation about Alkagesta, Alkagesta has engaged a PR team to diffuse what it describes as “damage to its reputation” but it is mostly engaging in censorship, lies and defamation itself. It has also published multiple sponsored articles on the mainstream press to divert attention and gratify the local press. Alkagesta also engaged the services of pseudo newspapers which are more like PR-media services. Alkagesta has also engaged in an extensive censorship campaign to censor the articles about it on Google and leave showing only the articles which write about it positively. Alkagesta even accused us of racism. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *