Advertisement

Why can’t we have a Parliamentary debate about the Chief Justice?

Owing to the deadlock in the appointment of the Chief Justice due to the intransigence of the Prime Minister and his insistence on appointing his friend and ally as Chief Justice, I suppose it is inevitable that this issue will be discussed in Parliament. However, the Opposition is holding back from discussing matter in public which I find strange, especially considering the alarming situation in which the Labour government wants to impose a dictatorship via a fait accompli.

The Nationalist Opposition needs to discuss the alarming state of rule-of-law in Malta where both the Office of the Attorney General and the office of the Police Commissioner are controlled by the government. The Opposition should not be helping the government to normaliseย  the current situation in which the government is manipulating the system of justice.

Added with the fact that the role of the Chief Justice is one of the most important State roles, the appointment merits a very wide and extensive discussion in Parliament and not backroom negotiations that disregard the political context of the rule-of-law crisis that we are in. The Opposition can not be trusted blindly about this matter especially after appointing Joe Giglio as its spokesperson for Justice, indicating a potential continuity with Labour over matters regarding the crisis in the rule-of-law.


Comments

One response to “Why can’t we have a Parliamentary debate about the Chief Justice?”

  1. Anonymous avatar

    The Prime Minister does not want to appoint Scerri Herrera. He broke protocol by announcing her name on purpose to torpedo her chances. Now, the PN will surely oppose her nomination, and Robert Abela can save face with Scerri Herrera through plausible deniability.

    Will Scerri Herrera see through the reverse-endorsement of Robert Abela?
    Will Robert Abela “compromise” on Edwina Grima, claiming the she is the unity candidate because the opposition opposed Scerri Herrera?
    Will Alex Borg play the bad cop and oppose Scerri Herrera, playing to Robert Abela’s script? Will he call Robert Abela’s bluff and agree on Scerri Herrera? Will he reach out to Scerri Herrera privately (or through intermediaries) to “sympathize” with her, subtly letting her know that the PMโ€™s public announcement was actually a move to ensure her failure?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *