Everyone is expecting answers on why the jurors decided to acquit Yorgen Fenech of the charges against him despite the overwhelming evidence against him. The public is also demanding answers about a survey of potential jurors conducted by Vincent Marmara on behalf of Yorgen Fenech’s legal defence team under a false name.
Below is an explanation by Ingram Bondin of how the survey could have aided Yorgen Fenech’s defence team in the selection of jurors. Bondin, who holds a PhD in Mathematics, explains that surveying people on their views of Yorgen Fenech and Daphne Caruana Galizia helps identify the majority opinion in different demographic sections and social groups.
For example, a survey might show that men have more sympathy for Yorgen Fenech than women, that young people have more sympathy for Daphne Caruana Galizia than older generations, and so on.
The survey is just one of the various irregularities that are being alleged to have occurred during the trial, raising hopes for a strong appeal by the Attorney-General, although calls for investigations are also growing.
Website Editor
Historian and Publisher
Leave a Reply