Advertisement

Opposition revives government-motion of Chief Justice nomination and votes it down

In another twist to the ongoing process of the nomination for Chief Justice, the Opposition in Parliament requested a vote over the government-motion presented yesterday nominating Judge Consuelo Scerri Herrera for Chief Justice. The motion was shot down by the Speaker yesterday, but the Opposition requested a vote to debate the motion.  The motion was not approved.

During the debate, the Prime Minister launched a tirade of accusations against the Opposition Leader while the Opposition Leader Alex Borg did not mention any compromise candidate in his speech.

Previously today, press reports stated the Opposition nominated Judge Edwina Grima for the post of Chief Justice. In Parliament, Opposition Leader Alex Borg denied that the name mentioned by the Prime Minister was proposed by the Nationalist Party. The Prime Minister said that the name proposed by the Opposition is connected to Jason Azzopardi: this is very unclear because Judge Edwina Grima was never accused of having a political bias.

The accusations and retorts by the Prime Minister have only muddled the debate over the Chief Justice even further, making it even more unclear who the compromise candidate may be. The Prime Minister tried to impose a fait accompli with his nomination of Judge Consuela Scerri Herrera and expected an immediate approval from the Opposition.

The President of the Republic, Myriam Spiteri Debono released a very brief statement urging both political parties to come to a compromise agreement.

You can watch the parliamentary session in full here.


Comments

4 responses to “Opposition revives government-motion of Chief Justice nomination and votes it down”

  1. […] post earlier today, Jason Azzopardi denied the Prime Minister’s allegations he made in Parliament yesterday. The Prime Minister alleged that Jason Azzopardi was dictating the choice of the Nationalist […]

  2. […] in Parliament, the Opposition voted against the government-motion to appoint Judge Consuelo Scerri Herrera for Chief […]

  3. […] The Prime Minister then reminded about Labour’s authoritarian and illiberal credentials by saying that he “was not going to allow the Opposition to start Magisterial inquiries”.   Magisterial Inquiries were the only untainted state procedure by which politicians could be investigated and the Labour government reformed the law to prevent any further Magisterial Inquiries. He also said that he was not going compromise with the Opposition over their preferred candidate for Chief Justice, alluding once again to Judge Edwina Grima. The Opposition denied that it made this proposal. […]

  4. […] The news belies claims by the Labour Party that the Nationalist Party nominated Judge Edwina Grima for the post. The Nationalist Party deneid the claims. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *